I Ketut Sukarma


This article describes the epistemology of mathematical scholarship, the constructivism view of mathematics and how mathematical learning can achieve the goals of which one is by studying discovery with a philosophical approach that emphasizes its implications on the learning of mathematics. The world of educational research, especially mathematics has shown a shift, which is more emphasize the teaching and learning process and research methods that apply the concept that, in learning someone to construct his knowledge. Humans construct their knowledge through interaction with objects, phenomena, experiences, and the environment. A knowledge is assumed to be true if it can be useful to confront and solve appropriate problems or phenomena. On constructivism view, knowledge can not be transferred from one person to another, but must be interpreted by one person individually. Knowledge is not something that is finished, but a process that develops continuously. In the process that the activity of someone who wants to know, very instrumental in the development of knowledge. Some factors such as limited previous construction experience, and a person's cognitive structure may limit the establishment of the person's personality. Conversely, conflict situations or anomalies that make people forced to think more deeply and situations that require people to defend themselves and explain in more detail, will develop one's knowledge. Constructivism is divided into three levels: radical, hypothetical realism, and the usual. This difference is based on the relationship between knowledge and existing reality.


Epistemology, Constructivism, and Discovery Learning

Full Text:



Ernes,Paul, 1991. The Philosophy of Mathematics Education.Basingstoke, Hampshire: The Falmer Press.

Glasersfeld, von ernst.1990. An Exposition in Mathematics Education: Why some like it Radical. Dalam Contructivism Views on Teaching and Learning Mathematics. (Davis, R.B dkk.Eds) Journal for Research in mathematics Education. Veston, Virginia: The NCTM Inc.

Glasersfeld, von ernst. 1993. Question and Answers abaut Radical Constructivism.Dalam The Practice of Constructivism in Science Education. (Tobin, K. Ed): Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Eilbaum Asssociates.

Glasersfeld, G.v. 1996. Aspects of Radical Contructivism and it Educational Recommandations. Dalam Theory of Mathematical Learning. (Steffe,dkk.Eds.). Mahwah, New Jersey; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publisher.

Goldin, G.A.1990. Epistimology, Contructivism and Discovery Lesrning Mathematics. (Davis, R.B. dkk. Eds). Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Veston, Virginia. The NCTM Inc.

Noding, N 1990. Contructivism in mathematics Education. Dalam Contructivism Views on Teaching and Learning mathematics. (davis, R.B. dkk. Eds). Journal for research in Mathematics Education.Veston, Virginia; The NCTM Inc.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v1i1.523


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2013 I Ketut Sukarma

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This journal has been indexed in:


Creative Commons License
J-PS (Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Matematika dan IPA IKIP Mataram) p-ISSN (print) 2338-4530, e-ISSN (online) 2540-7899 is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

View My Stats

[Valid Atom 1.0]